William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
THE RIGHT COURSE - AT 7:36 A.M. ET: We have real doubts here about a federal role in education, which by tradition has been a local and state function. Indeed, it seems to us that the best school systems in the country were built on local values and with local parental involvement, not by federal guidelines or grants. But the reality is that the feds are involved, and will likely stay involved. If that's the case, we'll at least want them to act intelligently, and it appears that there are some good things being done right now. We give credit where it's due. We hope the Obama White House doesn't fold under pressure from the teachers' unions. The New York Times has the story:
COMMENT: Look, this isn't ideal, and there are different ways of looking at education issues. But at least the federal government is demanding some standards. True, Washington should listen to concerns by the states, and keep itself out whenever possible. But if we're going to spend on education, we should demand results, not just more buildings and buses. There is also an important media role here. The media often shortchanges education stories, especially at the high-school level, by rarely reporting what is actually being taught, especially in politically charged subjects like history and, yes, even English. That must change. What must also change is the avoidance of certain truths. Good schools are built by good families and engaged parents. The culture at home determines the culture that students bring to the classroom. We know that, but it often seems to be a secret. August 17, 2009
|
|